Political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible meaning

In parity claims, "better" means "best", and "best" means "equal to". In this he highlights the double-talk and appalling prose of J. Being himself one of the leaders of the Communist Party of Italyhis theories had, in turn, been strongly influenced by the German social thinker Karl Marxand have their ideological roots grounded in Marxist theory of false consciousness and capitalist exploitation.

If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out. But what he called "the fight against bad English" is too often understood, thanks to the perversities of his own example, as a philistine and joyless campaign in favour of that shibboleth of dull pedants "plain English".

Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. It consists in gumming together long strips of words which have already been set in order by someone else, and making the results presentable by sheer humbug.

But an effect can become a cause, reinforcing the original cause and producing the same effect in an intensified form, and so on indefinitely. Such phraseology is needed if one wants to name things without calling up mental pictures of them.

Both groups exhibited behavior indicating that their hunger was satisfied, but rats in the second group which were fed saccharin solution died from malnutrition. Defenceless villages are bombarded from the air, the inhabitants driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine-gunned, the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets: From these, Orwell identifies a "catalogue of swindles and perversions" which he classifies as "dying metaphors", "operators or verbal false limbs", "pretentious diction" and "meaningless words".

In advertising[ edit ] Advertisers can use doublespeak to mask their commercial intent from users, as users' defenses against advertising become more well entrenched.

When these images clash — as in The Fascist octopus has sung its swan song, the jackboot is thrown into the melting pot — it can be taken as certain that the writer is not seeing a mental image of the objects he is naming; in other words he is not really thinking.

Examples that Orwell gave included "ring the changes", "Achilles' heel", "swan song", and "hotbed". Stuart Chase and others have come near to claiming that all abstract words are meaningless, and have used this as a pretext for advocating a kind of political quietism.

Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness. Words like phenomenon, element, individual as nounobjective, categorical, effective, virtual, basic, primary, promote, constitute, exhibit, exploit, utilize, eliminate, liquidate, are used to dress up a simple statement and give an air of scientific impartiality to biased judgements.

Furthermore, he said that using metaphors of this kind made the original meaning of the phrases meaningless, because those who used them did not know their original meaning. I feel there is still something left unsaid, though.

It is easier — even quicker, once you have the habit — to say In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption that than to say I think. The jargon peculiar to Marxist writing hyena, hangman, cannibal, petty bourgeois, these gentry, lackey, flunkey, mad dog, White Guard, etc.

Lutz has served as the third chairman of the Doublespeak Committee since Similarly, Herman's theory of doublespeak having an inherent nature to be manipulative and Chomsky's theory of "dichotomization" relates directly to the practice of doublespeak and how doublespeak is deliberately deceptive in nature.

Lutz uses the example of parity products: On the other hand, Terrence P. This time it must of its nature be an imaginary one. In our time it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing.

Let the meaning choose the word: Orwell on political language

Among the other phrases in contention were "difficult exercise in labor relations", meaning a strike, and "meaningful downturn in aggregate output", an attempt to avoid saying the word "recession".

Hermanpolitical economist and media analyst, has highlighted some examples of doublespeak and doublethink in modern society.

I think the following rules will cover most cases: Much of it is the kind of nonsense screed against linguistic pet hates that anyone today might compose in a green-text email to the newspapers. Orthodoxy, of whatever colour, seems to demand a lifeless, imitative style.

A mass of Latin words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outline and covering up all the details. Herman and Noam Chomsky note in their book that Orwellian doublespeak is an important component of the manipulation of the English language in American media, through a process called "dichotomization"; a component of media propaganda involving "deeply embedded double standards in the reporting of news".

Political language — and with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists — is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. Characteristic phrases are render inoperative, militate against, make contact with, be subjected to, give rise to, give grounds for, have the effect of, play a leading part role in, make itself felt, take effect, exhibit a tendency to, serve the purpose of, etc.

Around the same time Orwell wrote an unsigned editorial for Polemic in response to an attack from Modern Quarterly. A man may take to drink because he feels himself to be a failure, and then fail all the more completely because he drinks.

Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

The Defence Of The Indefensible

Never use the passive where you can use the active. Now that I have made this catalogue of swindles and perversions, let me give another example of the kind of writing that they lead to. The will construct your sentences for you — even think your thoughts for you, to a certain extent — and at need they will perform the important service of partially concealing your meaning even from yourself.

Steven Poole: My problem with George Orwell

The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.Orwell's purpose is to persuade readers to use simple language in political writing.

He achieves this by providing a list of specific rules for writing simply. In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible.

In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defence of the indefensible Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness the great enemy of clear language is insincerity.

"In our time political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible." - George Orwell In our time political speech and writing are largely the defense of.

"In our time political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible." - George Orwell In our time political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible.

Jul 05,  · Meaning of “In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible”?Status: Open.

Jul 05,  · Meaning of “In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible”? This is from Politics of the English Language. Relevance. Rating Newest Oldest. It means that the speech and writing of politicians are helping to protect vulnerable members of society.

Inquisitive · 4 years ago. 0. Thumbs up Status: Open.

Download
Political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible meaning
Rated 4/5 based on 57 review